Chapter One: The unlamented past (AKA The Manual Era)
It was a dark time to be a procurement leader. Procurement teams were drowning in siloed, unstructured data and too stuck in manual processes to manage spend with any success.
We begin our story in The Manual Era of procurement. The standard day-to-day for a procurement professional was marked by slow, labor-intensive processes requiring high levels of manual intervention from organizations' procurement team. Their day-to-day business was reactive, spending much of their time negotiating payment terms with suppliers, as well as firefighting and fixing payment and contract anomalies, due to:
- A lack of transparency into available contracts
- Little standardization of PR-PO processing
- A lack of consolidated supplier master data insights
- Information buried in unstructured data formats (like pdfs)
- Procurement data hidden in departmental / organizational silos
Read: 4 Ways Procurement is Evolving From Reactive to Proactive
This lack of visibility also opened the door to negotiated discounts or contractual obligations being missed, supplier performance not being tightly monitored, and increased procurement cycle time for crucial production resources. The procurement function was at risk of leaving money on the table, legal breaches, inefficient operations, and threats to on-time delivery performance.
Trouble was, as businesses scaled up or diversified geographically, it was increasingly impractical (often impossible) for the procurement organization to keep up with the volume of tasks requiring their attention. As a result, challenges like maverick buying – the purchasing of goods or services off-contract, outside approved supplier agreements, or beyond defined spending policies – were all too commonplace. That meant companies’ spend under management wasn’t always that closely managed.
And we’re not talking ancient history, here. In a Wall Street Journal article, telecoms giant Vodafone painted a vivid picture of the manual procurement burden it had faced as recently as 2015 (prior to engaging with Celonis). It would take 15 people three to four weeks compiling data about the previous months’ purchase orders, approval rates and key trends. By the time this process was completed, there was little or no time for the Vodafone team to draw actionable insights from the data. Not only that, but the data was already weeks out of date, and then it was time to start collecting it again for the next month.