5. High manual efforts — and automating at the wrong places
Order Management has a bad reputation of being a cost center. The symptoms? Your clerks get slowed down waiting on information, actions, or updates from Finance, Inventory, or Sales. They grapple with unnecessary credit checks, order holds, and order rejections. To save time, money, and valuable resources, many companies are focused on streamlining and automating order management as much as possible. And yes, you should streamline your process, leverage automation, and reduce the manual effort of your teams to the minimum.
https://delivery-p141552-e1488202.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:55e1855d-b033-45c5-a942-d9c8ba21e89c/as/image5.jpg
But many leaders have come to realize that bots alone can’t do the job. In the worst case, a hastily automated process can have a downstream effect that’s far more costly than a manual touch. For instance, if you run automated credit checks on every single customer, you’ll simply waste your time on those who are always paying on time. On the other hand, if you indiscriminately remove credit checks for all of your customers, you might increase On-time delivery, but ending up selling to some customers who can’t pay. In both scenarios, instead of making your process more efficient, you just accelerated a negative outcome — and severely harmed your revenue. The challenge is removing, automating, or expediting these steps without sacrificing other outcomes. What you need is an intelligent technology to identify which steps in your order management are worth automating, intelligently trigger those automations, and monitor the effect on your KPIs. Take a page from Siemens’ playbook: By identifying the best opportunities for automation within Order Management, they removed 10M manual activities and saved $15M in order processing costs.